A Verse by Verse Commentary of the Epistle of

Doctrine for the Tribulation
.Application for the Church

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Rightly Dividing

This commentary is aimed at Bible believers who desire to "rightly divide" the Bible. While there is great spiritual blessing for the Church in the epistle of I John, its primary doctrine is for the Tribulation. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate I John’s doctrine while also pointing out spiritual application for the Christian today. All scripture is for our learning and admonition, and it is permissible to spiritualize scripture to teach and preach. When teaching doctrine, however, one has to be careful to "rightly divide." When spiritualizing a passage to explain a scriptural or devotional application one can forget what it says. Here we will believe what a verse says and compare it to other scripture to determine what it means.

Christians are commanded to rightly divide the Bible.

Although it is a commandment, it is for the most part either ignored or misunderstood. God commands us to divide his word. Disobedience to that command is the cause of most doctrinal differences between Christians. Misunderstanding, confusion, and heresy are the result of an wrongly divided Bible. For instance the Bible says that people shouldn’t eat pork or shellfish in Leviticus 11. Yet I Timothy 4:1-5 says that it is permissible to eat anything. This example is obvious, however, and the division between the Old Testament and the New Testament is easily recognizable and accepted.

But there are also divisions within the Old Testament. The most obvious two are before the Mosaic Law and after the Mosaic Law. Noah was allowed to eat anything (Genesis 9:3), but Israelites were not. (Leviticus 11). Abraham and Sarah married with the Lord’s blessing even though they had the same father (Genesis 20:12), while the Israelites were forbidden to marry close kin (Leviticus 18:6).

God never changes, but he does change his rules and regulations in dealings with different people at different times. That is why he commands us to "rightly divide." If we don’t then there will be contradictions in his instructions.

Just as the Old Testament has divisions (e.g. before and after the law) the New Testament also has divisions. It is a common misconception that all the New Testament automatically applies doctrinally to the Church, even though it is in that very New Testament that a Bible believer is told to "rightly divide." If New Testament divisions are not observed there will be apparent contradictions, because God's commands and instructions sometimes differ in these distinct sections.

The Bible says that the New Testament didn't begin until after the crucifixion.

This means that doctrinally the four gospels, before Jesus’ death, are still dealing with Jews under the Mosaic Law. This time period is the first New Testament division. Its primary doctrine does not apply to the Church Age because at that time God was still dealing with Israel.

Abraham is chosen to be the father of the Hebrews in the book of Genesis. In Exodus the Jews are organized and God claims them as his chosen nation. The entire rest of the Old Testament deals with the nation of Israel. Jesus’ and his disciples’ ministry was to that nation.

Jesus prophesied that Israel would lose its standing but would eventually be restored. In the interval would be the "times of the Gentiles" (Luke 21:24).

The coming of the Messiah was the fulfilling of Old Testament Jewish prophecy. (Matthew 5:17,18) All through the Old Testament the Jews were waiting for their King to come, sit down on the throne of David, and set up his kingdom. John the Baptist preached the "kingdom" is at hand. Jesus preached the "gospel of the kingdom." (Matthew 4:23; 9:35; 24:14) Simple reading shows that this is not the gospel of I Corinthians 15: 1-4. The gospel Jesus preached was the Old Testament kingdom gospel that he preached to Israel. Paul’s gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ that should be preached to everyone.

The Church Age is the second New Testament division, and its doctrine is found in Paul’s epistles. He is the apostle during the "times of the Gentiles."

It is his doctrine that a Church Age Christian is to follow.

Paul was chosen especially by the Lord so he could reveal a new doctrine that was before time hidden. (Ephesians 3:1-8 and Galatians 1:11,12) He called it his gospel (Romans 16:25), and it is the gospel of salvation by grace through faith alone. This new doctrine is a shock to the Jewish brethren. That is why they needed an apostolic conclave in Acts 15 to proclaim its validity.

Now the next New Testament Bible division is the one in which I John falls. After the "times of the Gentiles" in the Church Age, God will again take up with his chosen people, the nation of Israel.

Now Paul writes to the Church from Romans through Philemon. The next book is Hebrews and the one after is James, written to the twelve tribes, which are scattered abroad. The doctrine in Hebrews through Revelation shifts back to the nation of Israel. Thus the Bible shows that there are at least three distinct New Testament Bible divisions.

Doctrinally the remaining books of the New Testament after Philemon are primarily for those in the Tribulation. In many places these books, including I John, contradict what Paul says. While these books have some great spiritual application for the Church Age Christian, much of their doctrine differs from the doctrine of Paul. Here are just a few examples.

VERSUS

The Matthew verse tells the individual Israelite that he himself must endure to the end to be saved, while Paul tells the Church Age Christian that the Lord will confirm him till the end. These verses contradict unless there is a division.

VERSUS

The Hebrews verse is a warning to Jews in the Tribulation that they will only be partakers if they hold stedfast, while Paul tells us that today’s Christian’s are partakers now.

Look at the last "contradiction" example between James and Paul.

VERSUS

James says that faith is made perfect by the works performed in the flesh. (ALL works are done in the flesh.) Paul says that works cannot make faith perfect!

Where there are contradictions we are told to rightly divide our Bible, and as you will soon see, this places I John in the last division of the New Testament where God is dealing with Israel again. These dispensational contradictions will be shown as they occur.

It must be remembered that dispensational Bible divisions are not completely rigid and that even true Bible believers will disagree about where to draw exact lines between them. It is not the exact lines that are important here, but the general agreement that some doctrines of the Church Age and the Tribulation are not the same. The actual verses themselves will reveal the differences between the two. It will also be observed that one division will discuss or prophesy about another. If a Church Age doctrine is found in a Tribulation book that does not mean that the entire book is doctrine for the Church Age.

It also should go without saying the many Bible doctrines are the same throughout the entire Book, as the inspiration of scripture and the Trinity, to name just two. And there are some doctrines for the Church found outside his writings that are not specifically described by Paul but that do not contradict any of his teachings. Tithing would be an example of such a Church Age doctrine. Our spiritual Father Abraham tithed.

Paul talks much about Christian giving in his epistles and the tithe is the only standard in the Bible on the subject of giving.

So while the doctrine of giving a tenth is not specifically mentioned by Paul it is the Bible standard that is recognized, and the Christian should consider this when he "purposeth in his heart."

Because most of God’s doctrines are the same throughout the Bible some Christians try to subjugate all doctrine to Paul’s epistles. To do this they cannot accept what the actual words say and have to privately interpret to explain "what they really mean." I know that there are many Christians who claim to believe in only one plan of salvation; but in order for them to believe that, they must ignore what the Bible says. The actual meanings of the actual words tell the truth of the matter. In this commentary we will believe the actual words and compare scripture with scripture to seek understanding.

With that understanding many questions will be able to be answered. "What is a sin unto death?" "What does "he cannot sin, because he is born of God" mean? "Who are the children of the devil?"

Now much of I John deals with the salvation of individual Israelites during the Tribulation. Since there is a definite parallel between this salvation and that of the Jews under the Mosaic Law, we are going to examine Mosaic salvation first, so that the similarities will be more obvious when they occur.

 


 

OLD TESTAMENT SALVATION

Under Mosaic Law

One must consider the nation and the individual when discussing Old Testament salvation under the Mosaic Law. The nation of Israel has a unique promise, a convenant from God, that no other nation has or ever will have. They have an unconditional guarantee from God that the nation will continue forever, and finally possess the land which God has promised them.

The individual within the nation of Israel was personally responsible for his own standing with God and had no unconditional covenant with him. As an individual, if he wanted to partake of the blessings of Israel, he had to remain in good standing within the nation. That meant obeying the individual laws and commandments which applied to him personally, and making the appropriate sacrifices when a commandment was broken.

All this will be detailed shortly, but first we must look at God’s covenant with his chosen people.

I. The Abramic Covenant with the Nation of Israel

This promise is given to the nation of Israel. When the promise was made God did not reveal his timetable, but the fact that it was indisputably believed is most obvious. God’s promise to the nation is repeated and mentioned many times by God himself and by those who are waiting for the fulfillment. Each successive generation looks toward God and waits.

A. God’s Blessings for Obedience

Even though the covenant is unconditional it is not a license for Israel to do as they wish. During the "wait" there were commandments which had to be kept. If they were broken there were temporal, earthly, consequences for that generation of the nation. This was laid down for them in Leviticus 26.

Leviticus 26:3
If ye walk in my statutes, and keep my commandments, and do them; 4 Then I will give you rain in due season...

The next verses go on to say that an obedient nation could expect bountiful harvests, peace from the elements, victory over enemies, growth as a nation, and the presence of God among them.

B. God’s Punishment for Disobedience

Disobedience, however, had its own set of consequences.

In the case of national disobedience God promised disease; defeat by enemies; stolen crops; powerlessness; fruitless harvests; attack by wild animals; wars ending in death, captivity, and dispersion; destroyed cities; cannibalism; and more. Even so, a repentant generation could regain God’s favor.

II. National Repentance for Sin

National repentance was possible only through the priesthood. They represented the people before God, offering sacrifices and praying on their behalf. They were the only ones authorized to approach God to ask forgiveness for the nation. God was very specific concerning the details of these requirements. The elders spoke for the nation (when necessary) and the priests performed the necessary procedures.

A. National Confession of Sin

Confession, of course, was only the first step to their regaining God’s blessing. His second requirement was blood sacrifice.

B. Blood Sacrifice, a Foreshadow of the Cross

The blood temporarily appeased God and had to be offered again and again.

But while it brought forgiveness it could not provide redemption.

The day of atonement (Leviticus 16) was an "everlasting statute" prescribed by God to make a yearly atonement for the sins of the children of Israel.

National repentance and offerings were a continuous occurrence when Israel was together as a nation. When the nation sinned and did not ask forgiveness, God’s punishment was often the scattering of the national unit into dispersion. When the nation was reunited it had to offer the prescribed sacrifices to gain forgiveness. Of course, the blood of bulls and goats was a foreshadowing of the blood of Christ, which would be shed "once for all" to redeem Israel.

It must be remembered that in order for sacrifices to be made the nation had to be functioning as such, with the Levitical priesthood, in order, following precisely the commandments of the Lord. They were the only ones permitted to offer the sacrifices. (Saul learned that lesson the hard way and lost his kingdom because of his presumption in this matter in I Samuel 13).

For example, if ninety-nine percent of the people in the United States agreed in wanting to enact a particular new national law, it couldn’t be done if the U.S. Congress was disbanded. Only the Congress has the legal right to make new laws that will affect the nation, regardless of what the individuals want. Thus, if everything wasn’t in order, there could be no national atonement for Israel. This was true again and again when God scattered the nation as one of its penalties for disobedience. But it also must be remembered that God’s covenant with the nation was unconditional. The promise that he made ensured the continuation of the nation even if many generations suffered because of disobedience to his commandments. The Old Testament is the story of Israel’s history as it vacillates between obedience and disobedience to God.

III. Individual Accountability under Mosaic Law during National Unity

While the standing of the nation of Israel was "eternally secure" because of God’s covenant with them, their state depended upon their obedience to his laws. The individuals within the nation were not eternally secure. Each person was responsible for his own standing with God. The list of commandments found in Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy were the rules which individuals were required to follow if they wanted to be right with God. They had the faith to believe that God would keep his promise to them if they did what he required.

Faith is always an element when doing what God says. One must believe that God will do what he promises for obedience. The things that God tells individuals or groups to do is not always the same, but obedience to his words encompasses the faith that believes God’s promises.

But salvation by grace through faith alone is contrasted as opposite of the Law.

So even though faith was and is always an element of obedience, it was not available as the sole means of salvation until Christ came. Under the Law the commandments were required to be kept. The individual who obeyed the statues was said to "live in them."

These last two Pauline verses show that this was "spiritual" life (howbeit only temporary until Christ came.) Individual spiritual life was "in" the law. Those who didn’t keep it were not "saved."

A. God’s Blessing for Obedience

Those who strove not to sin were blessed by God not only with salvation but also with temporal, earthly blessings.

For the individual who sinned and then brought the required sacrifice there was still blessing.

The "life" and "death" mentioned here are not physical only. It is very obvious that "physically" wicked people continued to "physically" live. The life and death here are spiritual, similar to what was said by God about Adam.

God said that Adam would "die" in the day he ate, and he did die spiritually on that day, and he began to die physically as well. The life that was earned by individual Jews who kept the commandments was spiritual life. The death that was earned by individuals who did not keep the commandments was sometimes immediate physical death but always eventual spiritual death in hell if they did not get right.

B. God’s Punishment for Disobedience

The nation received temporal, earthly punishment for disobedience, but the individual’s eternal destiny was in jeopardy when he was disobedient. On this side of the cross a sinner must deal with God personally and directly (Romans 10:13; Hebrews 4:16); but under the Mosaic Law the individual, as the nation, had to rely on the priesthood to perform the prescribed requirements. He could not personally offer a blood sacrifice. That made salvation much less secure when the nation was scattered, because the individual did not have access to the prescribed formula for forgiveness that was laid down in the Law. This reminds me of the Roman Catholic Church which teaches that forgiveness is obtainable only through their priesthood. The rules of most cults and false religions have roots in some kind of Bible truth.

Under Mosaic Law an individual sinned when he broke a commandment.

Even a commandment broken in ignorance was a sin and needed atonement.

While all sins are breaking of God’s commandments, there were two "kinds" of commandments that the individual could break. He could commit a sin for which the Lord had prescribed a particular blood sacrifice, or he could commit a sin for which there was no prescribed blood sacrifice.

IV. Individual Repentance in a United Nation

Numbers 5 reveals the three requirements for an individual to regain his standing with God after he has sinned breaking the first kind of commandment.

A. Confession of Sin

Just as it is with the nation of Israel, the first thing an individual sinner must do is acknowledge and confess his sin.

B. Restitution of Property

Secondly, if the sin was against another person or people, then restitution had to be made depending on what the Lord had prescribed in the law.

If there was no one else to receive the restitution then it was given to the priest.

C. Blood Sacrifice, a Foreshadow of the Cross

The priest was also given the ram with which to offer the required blood sacrifice for the atonement of the sin.

Just as the national sacrifices foreshadowed Christ’s redemption of the nation, so do the individual sacrifices foreshadow the salvation for all those who would believe thereafter.

V. Individual Accountability under Mosaic Law during Dispersion

Now during times of national dispersion the individual Jew who wanted to remain right with God and keep his personal salvation had no access to the mandated remedies if he sinned. God himself, therefore, judged each individual during those times using similar requirements.

A. Confession of Sin

First of all, again, sin must be acknowledged and confessed. This is a requirement under any conditions and under any dispensation. One cannot be right with God unless one acknowledges and confesses one’s sin.

B. Restitution of Property

And, of course, restitution had to be made. It was the "righteous" thing to do whether the nation was a functioning as a unit or not. It was a "do unto others" effort so that the Lord would recompense the individual accordingly. The Lord knew the transgression and the sinner knew the requirement. Recompense according to God’s requirements showed the repentant heart condition of the sinner, especially when there was no enforcing agency at the time. The priesthood was not necessary for this requirement because restitution was between the individuals involved.

C. Forgiveness According to Heart Condition

King Solomon foresaw the time, or just realized from previous history, that Israel would fall into apostasy again and be scattered. When he prayed his prayer of dedication for the temple in I Kings 8, he reiterated God’s promises to the nation and asked the Lord to heal Israel when it prayed and got right. He also recognized the plight of the individual sinner during times of dispersion, understanding that there was no way for an individual to make the required blood sacrifice for personal sins.

In his prayer he recognized that God alone knows the heart of an individual. A mere man cannot know another man’s thoughts, intentions, or motivations as God can. Solomon asked in this prayer that God forgive individuals who acknowledged and confessed their sins, even in a time of dispersion when no blood sacrifice was available. (Those who were worthy, whose hearts only God knew). I somehow doubt that this was an original request, but was probably another reiteration of what Solomon already knew was God’s method of operation. Then if the nation once again became right with God the individual’s sins for which he had been unable to offer sacrifices could be covered on the day of atonement.

It must be remembered that the blood of these animal sacrifices was only a temporary solution. Old Testament saints did not go to heaven. They went to Abraham’s Bosom to wait for the permanently effectual blood of the Lord Jesus Christ to be shed. It is only through his blood that irrevocable forgiveness and redemption can be found. This will be discussed in detail a little further on.

D. Observing the Passover

Even though the Passover was to be observed as a national memorial feast it was initially implemented for individuals.

Every man was to kill his own lamb for his own household so that the blood on the door would "save" his own firstborn. There were no Levites or priests required for this. The feast of unleavened bread which followed was observed within individual households. In Numbers additional instructions are given which shed even more light on this.

Even Jews who were unclean or physically far away were to observe the Passover. Since it was an individual observance that did not require national unity or the priesthood, the Passover could be observed by individual Jews even during the dispersion. This would be a indication of there heart condition and faith in God during a time when national blood sacrifices could not be made.

During national unity a person who failed to keep this memorial feast was cut off to bear his own sin.

Even a "stranger" could keep the Passover, showing "in type" that the "blood of the lamb" was for whosoever will.

VI. Getting Right Examples - The Nation and the Individual

II Chronicles 29 and 30 gives us a Bible example of Israel as a nation and its individuals getting right with God after wicked King Ahab.

Hezekiah was twenty five years old when he became the next king, and he did right.

I do not think that it is unreasonable to assume that Hezekiah did not assent to Ahab’s wickedness and that he tried to keep his heart right with God even during that time of apostasy. When he became king he immediately began to unto the damage and wickedness for which Ahab had been responsible. There had been no sacrifices made during Ahab’s reign (v7) and Hezekiah ordered the priests to sanctify themselves and the house of the Lord to be repaired so that the sacrifices could be reinstituted. When this was done sacrifices were made for the nation and for individuals.

Further, Hezekiah wrote letters to the surrounding Jews to come to Jerusalem to keep the Passover as a national memorial feast. Some came and some would not.

These two chapters in Chronicles give us examples of individuals who stayed right with God during a time of apostasy and also of individuals who got right after the time of apostasy was over. They also show the procedure for how the nation could regain its favor with God. As stated before, the procedure to get right always required blood sacrifices because under the Law "without the shedding of blood is no remission."

VII. Losing Personal Salvation under Mosaic Law

Individual Old Testament salvation under Mosaic law was not an automatic, eternal possession. Individuals could and did lose their salvation. Unlike salvation today during the Church Age, salvation under the law was earned by those who obeyed the commandments. An individual could lose his salvation in one of three ways.

The commission of this last kind of sin damned a person to hell without recourse and effected the nation as a whole until the matter was resolved. I hear protests from some readers but please read the scripture and believe its words. A New Testament verse gives light on this subject.

The last phrase of the verse says that there is no remission, no forgiveness, unless there has been a blood sacrifice under the Law. For the nation that meant that when they dispersed and cried out to God for forgiveness (and really meant it) that he would allow them victory over their oppression so that they could reinstate the law and make the necessary blood sacrifices to atone for their sins, as just shown from II Chronicles 29 and 30. This happened over and over again, and the blood sacrifices were absolutely required for the nation to get right.

For the individual Jew who was trying to stay right with God during national unity, this meant that he was required to offer the appropriate blood sacrifice (as well as confession and repentance) in order to have forgiveness. This was a requirement. It had to be done in order to earn forgiveness. If the prescribed sacrifice wasn’t offered there was no forgiveness because "without shedding of blood is no remission."

A. Refusal to Offer the Prescribed Sacrifice during National Unity

This person deliberately and presumptuously scoffed at God’s commandments. His refusal to offer the prescribed sacrifices for his sin indicated his wicked attitude of heart. Today, a person does not go to hell because he is a sinner. He goes to hell because he refuses to accept God’s way of forgiveness, the Lord Jesus Christ. It was similar for the Jews. For sacrificable sins, guilt continued until the sacrifice was made.

For he who did not sacrifice his "soul shall be cut off; his iniquity shall be upon him." Those phrases are used again and again in the Old Testament, but it is in the New Testament that the definition is easily understood.

There is no doubt. A person whose soul has been "cut off" or who has his "iniquity on him" or who "dies in his sins" will go to hell. Sin had to be forgiven either through the prescribed Mosaic formula at that time or by belief in the Lord Jesus Christ, now.

B. Refusal to Confess during Dispersion

Individual Jews had no excuse even when the nation was dispersed. They knew God’s commandments. Still, many let their own hearts deceive them into believing that God wasn’t keeping track.

Doing what was right "in his own eyes" precluded doing what was right according to God’s commandments. Even though the priesthood was not available to perform the blood sacrifices, they still had to do the best they could. If they did not, they took the chance of dying in their sins before Israel was reunited and the sacrifices reinstated. Those people who didn’t confess their sins or try to stay right with God during those trying times had their iniquity still upon them.

C. Committing an Unforgivable Sin

Just the title of this section has already got some readers defensive. But as I asked before, please just believe what that scriptures say. Now we need to look at the other half of a verse that has already been mentioned.

The first half of this verse says that "almost all things are by the law purged with blood." This means that for some things even the blood of bulls and goats could not secure forgiveness.

One such specific example is given in I Samuel concerning Eli’s sons.

This doesn’t seem like much of a sin to us today but it was "very great" to the Lord. The priests were special people and should have been an example to others in obedience to God’s laws. This was not their only sin.

These sound just like the "vestal virgins" of paganism that were available to service the carnal lusts of the priests. Eli’s sons were accurately names "sons of Belial." So for these sins there were no prescribed blood sacrifices and therefore no forgiveness.

The penalty for these sins was death and in this case the Lord allowed the Philistines to carry out the sentence.

Now each of the Ten Commandments, in certain degrees, are included in those sins for which there was no blood sacrifice available.

First & Second Commandments

When either of these commandments were broken by an individual the penalty was physical death and eternal hell.

Jehu destroyed idolaters in II Kings 10. He proclaimed a sacrifice for Baal and insisted that every Baal worshipper come. While they were in the house of Baal he ordered them all to be killed. These Israelite Baal worshippers died in their sins and went to hell.

Third Commandment

This sin would not have been difficult for a faithful Jew to keep. But once it was broken there was no prescribed sacrifice. It was unforgivable.

In Leviticus 24 a man is condemned to death by stoning for cursing the Lord. There was no possible blood atonement so there was no forgiveness. He went to hell.

Fourth Commandment

Of all the unforgivable sins, this one may be the hardest for us to understand. This one requires more faith in God because the "wickedness" of it is not clearly seen. It is more ceremonial in nature. But that may be the very point. God wants obedience even when the reason is not obvious. He wanted those Jews and us today to believe and do what he says even if we don’t understand.

One more proof that keeping this commandment was a heart and faith matter had to do with the fact that there were exceptions to the commandment which God himself allowed.

The heart of the man was judged by what he did even on the Sabbath.

Now if that heart was selfish or just disobedient then the penalty was carried out.

In Numbers 15 a man is stoned for gathering sticks on the Sabbath. This seems extreme to us today but one must remember that this was disobedience to a direct order from God. It was an easy commandment to keep and the penalty for disobedience was known. This man failed to heed or believe God when compliance would have been simple.

Fifth Commandment

Once more, death and hell for breaking this commandment is hard for us to fathom. But remember that God established the family even before he established the Church, and the honoring of one’s father and mother was not defined so that a child had to be sinlessly perfect. The family is the human foundation for all social order and once the foundation has crumbled there is nothing to hold up the rest, as is clearly shown by the condition of our own nation.

This fifth commandment is also called the first commandment with promise because an obedient child was promised that his "days may be long upon the land." Rebelliousness was something very severe, however, and it carried the most severe penalty.

In Deuteronomy 21 a rebellious son is stoned because of the testimony of his parents.

Sixth Commandment

Modernists and liberals try to "use" this Bible commandment to their own advantage to say that the death penalty for certain crimes is against God. Jesus himself, however, defined this commandment as murder and not a legal execution, when he was asked which commandments needed to be kept in order to have eternal life.

So then under the Law a murderer was to be put to death.

In II Samuel a murder and its consequences are described.

Seventh Commandment

Many people in our country do not think this is even as sin, let alone one which deserves the death penalty. But in Old Testament Israel this would not have been a difficult commandment to keep, especially since the consequences were known. As with any sin, however, the sinner always thinks that he will be the exception to get away with it.

The law is very clear and adultery requires death.

In Numbers 25 Zimri and Cozbi flaunt their immoral behavior in front of the entire congregation. Phinehas, the priest, kills them both and is commended by the Lord.

Eighth Commandment

Stealing had degrees to it. The penalties for different kinds of theft were described in the Law.

For petty theft there was restitution and additional payment; for kidnapping, however, the penalty was death.

Ninth Commandment

The first example concerns a lie which gains the liar some kind of material advantage. In order to receive forgiveness for this particular sin the liar must confess, restore with interest whatever he gained by his lie, and then make the appropriate blood sacrifice. Those are the steps for all forgivable sins.

The second kind of lie was much more serious. The example given says that the liar is to receive the punishment that he thought to inflict upon the person against whom he was lying. This could mean death in many instances. Some might argue that the example given below is a case of "civil" law, but in actuality it is God’s law concerning civil cases. Technically, Israel did not have "laws" made up by men. Their God gave them their "civil" laws as well, and that included the "civil" punishment of death, when necessary.

Naboth was lied about in I Kings 21. That lie led to his death so under the law the liars are worthy of death themselves.

Tenth Commandment

There are several examples concerning this commandment. Naboth was lied about because of this sin. The liar’s sin was lying but it was Jezebel who put things in motion because of the covetousness of Ahab.

Perhaps the most famous story of covetousness is that of Achan in the book of Joshua. This story shows exactly how an individual Jew under Mosaic Law could lose his personal salvation. In Achan’s case he disobeyed a commandment of God and a direct order from Joshua.

He acted upon the covetousness in his heart (which is where sin begins) and took the accursed thing. Until that time he had been righteous in the eyes of the law. Because there was no blood sacrifice for this particular sin, Achan lost his salvation!

His name had been in the book of life and the Lord blotted it out.

Now where there was a sacrifice for a particular sin, it was required to be made before the Lord would forgive the sinner. If he did not meet the requirement and make the sacrifice he was not forgiven. Without the shedding of blood is no remission or forgiveness.

RIGHTEOUSNESS UNDER THE MOSAIC LAW

There was personal righteousness under the Mosaic Law, and it was the responsibility of the individual to keep himself right with God. This righteousness was determined by whether or not an individual kept the commandments.

Zacharias and Elisabeth had this Old Testament righteousness.

If a person kept the commandments there was no sin imputed to him. Imputed righteousness does not mean that a person is sinless in a practical sense, but only in a judicial sense. He has been judicially declared sinless because he has met specific predetermined qualifications. Many a man has been declared "not guilty" by a jury in a court of law, when in fact he did commit the crime. Under the Mosaic Law the saint was continually "on trial" and he had to walk in the commandments and ordinances (which included making blood sacrifices) so that his sin wasn’t imputed to him. Those sacrifices "covered" his sins but could not "take them away." This will be discussed more in detail shortly.

Today a person has to believe on Christ to have imputed righteousness. The Christian is judicially sinless in Christ. That is his standing before God. Imputation can be explained this way. Suppose my life was represented by a book with a removable paper dust jacket. On the dust jacket the name of the book would be printed: This is the Life of DJ Root . Inside the book would be written every sin I committed and every sin I will commit in the future. Another book on the table is entitled: This is the Life of the Lord Jesus Christ . His pages are spotless white because he never committed a sin. When I received the Lord Jesus Christ as my Saviour the dust jackets were exchanged. Now my pages are spotless and sinless while his are not. His sinless life is imputed to me and my wicked life is imputed to him. Speaking of Abraham’s faith Paul wrote:

The Lord Jesus Christ took our sin upon himself that we might be able to stand before God in his righteousness.

Those who have trusted him have his righteousness credited to their own accounts. This is a judicial or legal declaration. Practically, however, all Christians still sin. This is their state before God, and the penalty for their sin will be in reaping what they sow. They can reap temporal problems and loss of eternal rewards for their sins, or they can reap eventual eternal rewards for their obedience.

The personal righteousness earned by obeying the Law was not the same as the righteousness that is freely given when one trusts Christ as his personal Saviour.

We have a hard time understanding how anyone could be righteous outside of those in Christ, but God’s standards for defining righteousness change in different dispensations, as seen by the verses previously quoted. Under the Mosaic Law it was defined by commandment keeping. Today it is defined by being in Christ.

 


 

NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR INDIVIDUAL UNFORGIVABLE SINS

There was no guarantee of eternal life under the law because it depended upon the conduct of the individual. As mentioned before the nation of Israel was and is eternally secure. They have an unconditional promise, but the individual within the nation had to keep the commandments.

Achan’s sin effected not only himself and his family but the entire nation as well.

In this example and others it shows that the Lord held the nation responsible when an individual within the nation committed one of the sins for which there is no blood sacrifice. It was then the responsibility of the nation to "put away" that sin from them. This was done by killing the guilty party. All "unforgivable" sins were punishable by death. Achan was stoned.

"Unforgivable" sins committed by individuals had to be dealt with or the nation itself would be in jeopardy of God’s anger. In Achan’s case the nation was defeated by the small town of Ai until Achan was stoned so the nation could be forgiven. The unforgivable sin of murder was punished by death as well.

The blood of the murderer cleansed the land. In the case of an unsolved murder God gave another remedy which is found in Deuteronomy 21:1-9. The elders of the city, with the priests present, were to behead a heifer in a "rough valley" and wash their hands over it declaring their innocence.

This may be the very procedure used to lift the blood guilt of the crucifixion from the generation of the present nation of Israel. Pilate himself may have been aware of this passage of scripture. Of course, his washing was in vain.

The nation put itself under the ultimate curse by allowing the unjust murder of Christ.

That blood guilt remains to this day and God’s wrath on Israel can easily be reviewed by the modern history of the nation. Once the veil of the temple was rent at the crucifixion there were no more animal sacrifices that would gain remission for forgivable sins. The last "national" sin was the murder of their Messiah.

 


 

THE DAVIDIC COVENANT

To complicate the matter of Old Testament salvation there is one glaring exception to all the rules. David and his children are given a special promise by God. We call this Davidic Covenant : "the sure mercies of David." Nathan first explained it to David in II Samuel 7:12-16.

The first verses have immediate fulfillment in Solomon but verse 16 points far into the future to the Lord Jesus Christ, who will return soon to finally sit on the throne of David. The first part of the covenant had a guaranteed end, with David’s throne established forever; but the continuation of his seed on the throne, until the Lord’s return, was conditional. In order for a man from his line to remain king they had to love the Lord and be obedient to the Law. These next verses are David’s instructions to Solomon.

Solomon reiterates this conditional promise again in I Kings 8:25.

The second part of the covenant, however, had no such conditions. In fact "the sure mercies of David" are a "type" of Church Age eternal security. While "grace" is the Lord giving us something we don’t deserve, "mercy" is the Lord’s refraining from giving us what we do deserve. One dictionary defines "mercy" as "the act or instance of forgiving." Neither David nor any of his children could lose their individual salvation because of God’s promise to him. The covenant is best explained in Psalm 89.

Here is the covenant concerning David’s throne. Notice that the throne is not built up to all generations until it has been established forever. That would be a future reference to the throne of the Lord Jesus Christ, because as noted before, the continuation of David’s seed on his throne is conditional.

The "holy one" of verse 19 is David himself, and is contrasted to the Holy One, the Lord Jesus Christ , the King, in verse 18. The mention of the "vision" verifies this.

Other verses of the Psalm indicate the personal "sure mercies" to himself and his children. Remember, "mercy" is refraining from the traditional or predetermined punishment. His children who break the commandments are chastised only, and cannot lose their individual salvation as other Israelites can.

This promise of individual eternal security is a type of the eternal security that a Church Age believer has today. According to Paul’s doctrine a Christian who sins will be chastised by the Lord but can never lose his salvation. David and his offspring also have this promise under the Mosaic Law. But they were only a few to whom this promise was given compared to all the individuals of the nation. David himself, as an adulterer and murderer, benefits from this special covenant. Under the law either of these sins demanded death as David surely knew. He knew that the Law provided no animal sacrifices that would gain him forgiveness.

That was why David feared losing God’s Spirit. God would have taken the Spirit from him permanently for those offenses, had it not been for the covenant. He felt so guilty after Nathan had confronted him about Bathsheba and the murder of Uriah that he doubted God’s promise of "sure mercies" and he asked God not to cast him out or take the Holy Spirit from him.

But God does not lie. David received his "sure mercies" and was forgiven.

Notice how Nathan stated that the penalty for David’s sins was death. Another example of God keeping his covenant with David’s offspring is found in II Chronicles.

The Lord punished the entire nation for the wickedness of its king. That may seem unfair to us, but remember that each individual was responsible for his own eternal destiny. Many individuals died because of the king’s wickedness, but that was physical death only. The final abode of the soul always rested in the hands of the individual.

This, of course, is also true for salvation today. David’s sure mercies" are now available to us in the Lord Jesus Christ. It was even prophesied in the Old Testament.

Samuel’s parting words to David show another parallel to Church Age Christianity.

A sinning Christian gives the lost world an opportunity to disparage Christ and his believers, and he will also reap what he sows.

David’s special covenant is mentioned again and again. The only question left to answer is why would God choose this one man to receive such peculiar and particular blessings in the midst of the Law? Blessings that even extended to his children. I don’t know if that question can be answered any more than why God chose Mary to be Christ’s mother, or why he chose Abraham to be the father of all believers. Mary was "blessed" among women, and Abraham was the only man called the "Friend of God." In the same respect, David was the only man said to be "a man after God’s own heart." God said that he sought for such a man, and of that man he would raise up a Saviour.

God’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts, and we are not necessarily called to understand the whys of God, but rather just to believe his words.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of those covered under the Davidic covenant, individual salvation under Old Testament Mosaic law was earned by obeying the commandments and offering the appropriate sacrifices. When that was done an individual was "saved." If that same individual failed to obey a commandment and/or offer the appropriate sacrifice that individual lost his salvation. He could, however, get right with God at a later time and regain God’s favor with obedience and restitution. If an individual committed an unforgivable sin he had no recourse. There was no avenue of forgiveness and he went to hell.

 


Home